A letter from Lan's senior :
"Dear Lan :
Our group recently need people from shooting department to take the exam of distinguished our planes from enemy's. However, I don't think they will get good grades on it. Since you're graduated from national taiwan university, and thus i think you can perform well even you're not from shooting department.
Have a good day ! "
作答區
The argument made by Lan's senior concluded that Lan should take the exam just because he can perform better than people from shooting department. To support this, the writer claims that Lan can get higher grades because he has been graduated from National Taiwan University. At first glance, the writer's argument seems to be somewhat appealing; however, I do not find this argument logically convincing because the conclusion rests on the unsound assumption that people who graduated from higher education will perform better than any other else in any situation.
First of all, in this argument, the senior presumptuously links higher educational background to better performance in any aspect. There is no guarantee this is the case. Apparently, the author failed to consider other factors may also affect the result. For example(要提出對照類的故事), people with higher educational degree mastering in Accounting have difficulty fixing the broken engines. Furthermore, the senior fail to take into account possible explanations for having well performance on exam. There are other factors such as experiences from
Secondly(/In addition), since the exam is assumed to be taken by people in shooting department, it is designed to evaluate their learning outcomes. Making an unrelated person to take the exam completely distorts the original intent of the exam and thus make the grades meaningless. As a result, I don't think the senior should ask Lan for taking the exam.(此不構成論述邏輯上的錯誤，只能說前提在事實上是錯了的)
In conclusion, there are several factors in better performance. The author should offer other evidences to support his assumption that people from NTU perform better than others. Additionally, making people to take the exam which should have been taken by others totally distort the original intent of the exam. Obviously,
casulty 死亡人數
資料來源:
http://bairdben.pixnet.net/blog/post/7161443-jason%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E5%AD%97%E5%85%B8-%E8%BB%8D%E9%9A%8A-%E9%83%A8%E9%9A%8A-%E9%9A%8E%E7%B4%9A-%E7%94%A8%E6%B3%95
軍隊英文
squad(班)
platoon(排)
company(連)
battalion(營)
regiment(團)
brigade(旅)
division(師)
中華民國軍 隊軍階是參考美國軍階而制定。由於當時歷史特殊性考量，於1935年，由當時國民政府主席林森任命前 總統 蔣中正先生為五 星特級上將，負責當時中國戰區之最高統帥。所以中國民國目前為止只有前總統 蔣中正先生是五星特級上將。下表僅就目前中華民國一般軍種軍階體制而製：
軍階 Rank
|
陸軍 Army
|
海軍 Navy
|
空軍 Air Force
|
一級上將(四星)
|
General Chief of Staff
|
General Chief of Staff
|
General Chief of Staff
|
二級上將(三星)
|
General
|
Admiral
|
General
|
中將(二星)
|
Lieutenant General
|
Vice Admiral
|
Lieutenant General
|
少將(一星)
|
Major General
|
Rear Admiral
|
Major General
|
上校
|
Colonel
|
Captain
|
Colonel
|
中校
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Commander
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
少校
|
Major
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Major
|
上尉
|
Captain
|
Lieutenant
|
Captain
|
中尉
|
1st Lieutenant
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
|
1st Lieutenant
|
少尉
|
2nd Lieutenant
|
Ensign
|
2nd Lieutenant
|
一等士官長
|
Sergeant Major
|
Master Chief Petty Officer
|
Chief Master Sergeant
|
二等士官長
|
Master Sergeant
|
Senior Chief Petty Officer
|
Senior Master Sergeant
|
三等士官長
|
Sergeant 1st Class
|
Chief Petty Officer
|
Master Sergeant
|
上士
|
Staff Sergeant
|
Petty Officer 1st Class
|
Technical Sergeant
|
中士
|
Sergeant
|
Petty Officer 2nd Class
|
Staff Sergeant
|
下士
|
Corporal
|
Petty Officer 3rd Class
|
Senior Airman
|
上等兵
|
Private 1st Class
|
Seaman 1st Class
|
Airman 1st Class
|
一等兵
|
Private
|
Seaman
|
Airman
|
二等兵
|
Private Basic
|
Seaman Apprentice
|
Airman Basic
|
沒有留言:
張貼留言